In Canggu I was sitting at one of those cafes imported from Melbourne, writing in my journal, when a man from the next table approached me. He noticed I was writing in a paper journal. Would I be interested in hearing how AI could transform journaling?
He had relocated from Canggu from LA and had been working on a program where you journal to an AI - and then it acts as a life coach, keeping you accountable and setting you goals.
I was intrigued. I wanted to do something similar with a Stoicism project I’d been thinking about. But instead of telling AI your problems, my project connected you with people - real people. I wanted to focus on solutions for men. Men helping other men with their problems.
This guy recoiled. There was no way he would share his problems with another dude. It was too personal - no, the good thing about an AI coach or a bot therapist was that you could tell them anything, and no one would know. We swapped handles and I contemplated the reach of his project. The death of paper journals, human life coaches - and maybe even the need for friendship and intimacy itself?
*
After Canggu I went up to the remote mountains to stay at an eco lodge with my friend Mel. She wanted to space out so hard up there that she forgot her own name. We set about emptying our minds. It wasn’t too hard. There was bad wifi at the lodge, none in the room and apart from visiting nearby farms - not much to do. The only book in our joglo was the Accelerationist Reader - a dense collection of essays on the rather prescient philosophy, which calls for the ‘drastic intensification of capitalist growth, technological change, and other processes of social change to destabilise existing systems and create radical social transformations.’
Up here in the mountains - away from the traffic jams down south - the book was a strange, discomforting companion.
The days passed in a pleasant fugue state. We could have been anywhere - but we were here, staring out at a canopy of green, eating macrobiotic food, reading about the need to speed things up. There were fewer tourists up here and not many digital nomads. We met an out of work yoga teacher in the sauna (“there is an over-supply of yoga teachers in Ubud,” she told us), where she and her friend sat in the heat and played the Tibetan bowls and I broke the meditative, sweaty trance to talk about the mushroom murder trial back home.
*
I have been thinking about digital nomads and Bali. The feeling of ‘this is a cool, aspirational lifestyle’ has morphed (or milkshake ducked) to a trend that is not just bad for the inhabitants (loneliness, alienation etc) but terrible for communities and the local economies.
Infrastructure for digital nomads in say Canggu (the AI guy was a digital nomad) make living and working frictionless. There is the promise of a cheap massage at the end of a long day at your desk, and a decent Melbourne coffee at the start. But the strain on Bali’s resources - including water, is immense.
I see Bali as a second home - but of course I’m part of the problem. The problem is there are too many tourists, too many nomads. But the problem is also the economy is heavily reliant on tourists. In 2019, tourism accounted for 61% of Bali's GDP, and since the introduction of a visitor tax (around $55 AUD per person) , millions of dollars are pouring into the country’s coffers before tourists have even left the airport.
Ask a Balinese person who works in the tourism industry about life during the pandemic and they look genuinely freaked out and tell you about having to go back to their village to work on a chicken farm, rice field or digging roads.
Things are back to normal now - in fact better than normal. In 2024, Bali welcomed 6,333,360 foreign tourists, marking a significant increase of +20.10% compared to 2023 which stood at 5,273,258.
But there is a growing sense of precarity every time I visit the southern part of Bali. Where is the tipping point? When will it occur? How much is too much?
*
Down from the mountains, back in Ubud - I see the signs of decline everywhere - but maybe only because I have been looking for them (and reading the Accelerationist Reader).
On a sweet, small path with overhanging blossoms and views of the volcano - a woman in athleisure, wearing earbuds, roughly pushes me aside, as I’m reading the community noticeboard for upcoming ice bath workshops.
At an expensive vegan cafe - a woman at a nearby table, maybe in her 40s sitting alone - contorts her face as being told to suck cement from a straw. Her face is pulled and pained. She’s taking a selfie. She puts the phone down and goes back to looking contemplative, even sad. She picks up the phone, checks the photos and does the whole thing again - different angles, getting her drink in the shot, getting more cleavage.
I can’t look away. Sure, I’ve seen people taking selfies before but this seemed somehow emblematic of something bigger. It spoke to the gap between what we present as ourselves as being on-line (hot, on holidays, in a vegan cafe in Bali) and what is our actual reality (alone? bored? disconnected?). In Ubud that week, I sensed as a palpable force, the loneliness of the digital nomad - alone with a phone, earbuds in, eye contact avoided, a screen between you and them.
*
Perhaps when I started coming here 11 years ago - I was someone else’s dog barking, someone else’s tipping point. Maybe they saw me in the Savannah Moon cafe near the Palace - doing something vain or stupid or just not within keeping of the place - and decided it had all gone to shit.
I shouldn’t judge. (Yet I do). I wonder if the accelerationists predicted growth would look like this.
On a different tangent- what I like about your Stoic project idea is that (putting aside the AI vs human element for a moment) it starts with the problem... and THEN goes looking for a targeted Stoic solution.
This to me is distinct from the usual approach of learning about that kind of stuff- ie starting with reading the literature (the solutions), and THEN going looking for the problems in your life it can assist with.
I think Stoicism (being the practical philosophy it is), is uniquely placed to do this 'start with the problem' approach.
Bespoke, agony aunt style problem solving is very hard to do for dogmatic religions and theory heavy philosophies.
Unlike many religions or philosophies- you don't need to be a full blown follower or devotee to garner real world benefit from Stoicism.
Of course, you only get out what you put in- so any benefits would be very small for anyone limiting themselves to just ingesting quotables (via AI chatbot or humans posting memes on socials etc).
But every great journey begins with one small step right?
Here's something to ponder: perhaps your AI friends chatbot idea is complementary to your idea- instead of it being a competitor?
Maybe his idea of journalling to an AI chatbot would 'warm guys up' to taking the next step (ie your idea of sharing their problems with real people).
Perhaps the leap (sharing problems with brutal honesty with a real person) IS too great for many guys? Even with the relative safety of doing it in a virtual setting.
If so- an AI journalling thingo could be a stepping stone and help create more guys ready to talk with a real person.
Maybe advertising your hypothetical real person service to AI chatbot users would catch clients for your service that like the AI stuff... but get bored of its shallowness and inhumanity- and want more substance and results?
Your friends at the guardian have seemingly been seeing the same things you have down south Brigid- so I don't think it's Accelerationist induced bias!
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/17/bali-crime-rising-indonesia-australian-tourists-ntwnfb
Quantity (of tourists) up + Quality (of tourists) down = a sad state of affairs it sounds like.
The fix would seemingly be for the local authorites to walk the tightrope of enforcing measures which limit quantity and improve quality- while not being too heavy handed and scaring the minimum volumes of required tourists away